Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LP-SO <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />the front of the building, this non-conformity will also be <br />eliminated. The building permit application is being processed <br />on the assumption that this non-conformity is being eliminated <br />and therefore, a non-conforming use permit is not neened. If <br />the front yard parking continues, the application will have <br />violated the conoitions under which the building permit was <br />issued. The applicant should, therefore, effectively control <br />his tenants to prevent parking in the driveway. <br /> <br />We woula suggest no parking signs as one way to begin that <br />control. <br /> <br />P1anninq Commission Consideration & Recommendation (Mav 21. 1977): <br /> <br />The City Planner reviewed his comments noting that the existing <br />Type IV non-conformities on the property would be eliminated <br />according to the plans submitted. <br /> <br />Mr. Lange, applicant, was present to answer questions. <br /> <br />Motion by Anderson, seccnded by lHckland, to recommend approval <br />of LP-SO subject to conformance with site ano 1anascape plans <br />submitted. 8uch recommenaation hased on the following Findings <br />of Fact: <br /> <br />1. The plans submitted are complete and contain all <br />required information. <br /> <br />2. All code requirements are met. <br /> <br />3. The proposed plans indicate that all existing <br />Type IV non-conformities will be eliminated. <br /> <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />