Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LP-99~ NC-44 <br />Page #3 <br /> <br />In this particular application~ staff contends that the size <br />of the front yard landscape strip could not be expanded without <br />reducing the manuvering and parking'area necessary to the use <br />of the gasoline pumps ,on the east side. <br /> <br />In re~ard to the non-conformity of the ,lack of the 251 buffer' <br />strip, staff notes that R-l property across Rice Creek Road is <br />church property allowed inaR-l district by special use permit <br />and not single family"homes. The applicant in 1976, provided <br />the 15 foot landscape strip that is required in a side street <br />yard..It appears that because .the land uses south of Rice <br />Creek Road are a church'and apartment complex that in 1976 the <br />applicant was not required to provide the 25 foot buffer strip. <br />In the opinion of staff wi~ening the landscape area to 25 feet <br />would greatly hamper the internal circulation on the site. <br /> <br />The eastern most driveway ,on ~ice Creek Road is approximately 3D <br />feet f~om theright~of~way df theiritersection. The code <br />requires the drivewaytobe atleast,50 feet from the right-of- <br />wayuof the intersection. The applicant contends that the driveway <br />,location i~necessaryin relation~hip tb the service island and <br />that if onemeasure'd' curb to curb' rather than' by the ri ght-of-way <br />the distance is about. 46 feet. The app'1icant 'feels that since <br />the concrete curbing was re,quiredin 197:6 it is ,no practical to <br />remove th e cu rbi ng an d close' or a lter'th,e 'd ri veway . <br /> <br />In r.espect to the three, driveways ,the c'ompany states that western <br />most drive facilitates yehicles servicing the underground tanks and <br />customers llsing"the store portion of --the site." Having this <br />driveway separates:these persons from th6se along Silver Lake <br />R~ad using the service island. <br /> <br />Staff tonterids that to meet the intention of'thenon-conforming <br />use permit, that the applic.ant 'should be required to provide <br />additional landscaping to better buffer<and screen the site. <br />It might not be practical however to requi,reuthat the landscaping <br />areas are enJargedor that, oneof,the drivewayscbe closed. <br />, ' . <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> <br />The plans pr,esented are complete and contain.all necessary informa- <br />tion. It should be noted that the parking space calculation is <br />based on the addition being used only for storage and this should <br />be a condition of approval. Also, the station presently has a <br />storage unit for salt in the northern portion of the site and this <br />unit is located on one of the ~esignated parking spaces. The <br />unit-has to be removed and all product display outside the building <br />should be removed. <br />