Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lP-99, NC-44 <br />Page #3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />In this particular application, staff contends that the size <br />of the front yard lands,cape strip could not be expanded without <br />reducing the manuveringandparking area necessary to the use <br />of the gasoline pumps ,on the east side. <br /> <br />In regard to the non-conformity of the ,lack of the 251 buffer' <br />strip, staff notes that R-l property across Rice Creek Road is <br />church property allowed'in aR-l district by special use permit <br />and not single famUy.homes~The applicant in 1976, provided <br />the 15 fo~t landscape stri~that is required in a side street <br />yard. .It appears that because the land ,uses south of Rice <br />Creek Road are a church'and apartment complex that in 1976 the <br />applicant was not requited to provide the 25 foot buffer strip. <br />In the opinion of staff wi~ening the landscape area to 25 feet <br />would greatly hamper the internal circulation on the site. <br /> <br />The eastern most driveway ,on Rice Creek Road is approximately 30 <br />feet f~om the right~of~wayrif the intersection. The code <br />requires the dri~ewaytobe at least.50 feet from the right-of- <br />way of the intersection. The appli.c~nt contends that the driveway <br />location is necessary in relationship to the service island and <br />that if one measured curb to curb rather than by the ri ght~of-way <br />the distance is about 46 feet. The applicant feels that since <br />the concre'te curbing was re,quired in 197.6 it j5no practical to <br />remove the curbi ng and close 'or alter .th,edri veway. <br /> <br />In respect to the' ,three driveways, the company states that western <br />most drive faci 1 i tates .vehicles servi ci ngthe underground tanks and <br />customers using the store p'ortion of,'the site.", Having this ' <br />drivewayseparates.these'persons from those along Silver lake <br />Road using the service island. ' <br /> <br />Staff tonteridsthat to meet the intention of the non-conforming <br />use permit, that the applicant 'should be required to provide <br />additional landscapingHto better buffer and screen the site. <br />It might not be practical however to require that the landscaping <br />areas are enJargedor that one of the driveways be closed. . <br /> <br />BUIlDING.PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> <br />The plans pr,esented are complete and contain all necessary informa- <br />tion. It should be noted that the parking space calculation is <br />based on the addition being used only for storage and this should <br />be a condition of approval. Also, the station presently has a <br />storage unit for salt in .the northern portion of the s'ite and this <br />unit is located on one of the desi~nated parking spaces. The <br />unit has to be removed and all product display outside the building <br />should be removed. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />j <br />