Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />LP-99, NC-44 <br />, Page #4 <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />APRIL 15, 1980, <br /> <br />Ken Olson, representing SuperAmeri,ca was present to answer <br />questions., He stated that the firm understood the conditions and <br />would comply with the co~ditionsrecommended by staff. <br /> <br />'Motion by Williams, second by Baker to recammend approval of NC-44 <br />by waiving the reading and adopting a resolution with conditions. <br /> <br />5 Ayes'- 0 Nayes, motion carried. <br /> <br />Mot i on by ,.,Will i ams, second by Sande to recommend approva 1 of LP-99 <br />contingent on the conformance with the conditions of NC-44 and <br />conformance with the site and revised landscape pl~ns dated and <br />signed by the applicant and City Planner. <br /> <br />5 Ayes '- 0 Nayes, mot ion ca rri ed. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends that NC-44 be approved by walvlng the reading and <br />adopting the attached resolution with cbnditions. Staff further <br />recommends that the' Council approve LP-99 by simple motion <br />contingent on the conformance with the conditions of NC-44.and <br />conformance 'with site and tevised landscape plans dated:and signed, <br />by the applicant and tity Pl~nner. <br /> <br />I certify that I haVe <br />reviewed this report and <br />have: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />o n M. Archer <br />ty Planner <br /> <br />No comments to <br />supplement the <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Attached written <br />comments to <br />supplement the <br />~ndation. <br /> <br />'J~ <br />City ager <br /> <br />1j2-'ifs() <br />Date <br />