My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LP-101
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Site Plan File - Approved PLZ 01900
>
LP-101-200
>
LP-101
>
LP-101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2006 1:01:35 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:10:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
House File
Address
SW CORNER OF 6TH ST SW & SUNSET LN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.sP-93, PL-122, LP-10l <br />/ Page #2 <br /> <br />ADJACENT LAND USE: <br />PRD QUALIFICATIONS: <br /> <br /> <br />Map <br /> <br />A PRD cannot be considered because the <br />site does not have the required minimum <br />of 2 acres. <br /> <br />REZONING: <br /> <br />The rezoning of this property to R-3A or <br />R-3B would be inconsistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The plan indicates <br />a two family land use which implies an <br />R-2 density. <br /> <br />APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL <br /> <br />The applicant proposes to construct a four unit townhouse develop- <br />ment on a site approximately one (l) acre in area. The site plan <br />proposed by the applicant contains all necessary information and <br />meets all zoning code requirements in regard to lot dimensions <br />and setbacks. However, the purpose of the special USe permit is <br />to provide for a mechanism for the City to work with the <br />applicant on the number of units and the layout and design of <br />those units. Because the property is zoned R-2 the applicant <br />could construct a 2 unit dwelling withQut Council nor neighborhood <br />involvement or approval. <br /> <br />The rationale given by the applicant for more than 2 units is <br />based on the large size of the lot, land value and the close <br />proximity to the Brighton Village Apartments. The lot is large <br />in size, when compared to the required area in an R-2 district I_fl, <br />of 12.500 s,guare feet. As far as density/. a parcel this size ~/~~ <br />4 f 0 u run its l~ ~ 11 J t] 11' r ~ under an R - 1 den s i ty at the standard <br />10,000 square feet in area. However, size is not the only <br />determinant in this proposal. <br /> <br />The real issue is whether more than 2 units would provide an <br />adequate buffer between the R-3A use and the established R-l <br />district without adversly affecting the single family dwellings <br />in the area. The design of these units with one of the units <br />above the garages somewhat reduces the amount of land developed <br />and also somewhat offsets the bulk of the build~ng. <br /> <br />The applicant tried to provide for a layout for the units that <br />would not negatively impact adjacent single family dwellings. <br />The building is turned to follow the contour of the street so <br />that the adjacent neighbors would only envision the side of the <br />building and the large rear yard. The driveway, garages and <br />parking spaces are located on the eastern and southern portions <br />of the property to be spatially removed from the single family <br />dwellings. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.