Laserfiche WebLink
<br />L'P-141 <br />Page #2 <br /> <br />Winfield Developments, Inc., applicant, is a subsidiary af Winfield Companies af <br />Winnipeg, Manitoba. Winfield Developments has been in the Twin Cities since 1978. <br />Winfield Developments currently has prajects in Edina and also. in the Riverview <br />Park area af St. Paul. The current prapasa1 is to. build three buildings in a , <br />phased appraach with the first building being the middle of the three buildins andc <br />wau1d be af a tatal size af 54,220 square feet. Winfield is propasin9 to. being <br />canstructian af this Phase I building in July, 1983. On March 22, 1983 the City <br />Cauncil will be cansidering an application af Winfield Developments for industrial <br />revenue bands and also. will have befare it a develapment agreement far cansideratian. <br /> <br />The site itself is advantageausly lacated at the intersectian af Caunty Raad "D" <br />and 1-35W. The site has appraximately 14,000 feet af frantage alang 35W and is <br />appraximately 300+ feet in depth. The site has same unique prab1ems as far as <br />easements far utility lines, starm sewer lines, gas lines and NSP lines that impact <br />develapment af this site. The Phase 1 building wau1d be 1acated immed1ately north <br />af a sanitary sewer line that crasses the praperty in a east-west fashian. <br />Canstructian af the Phase I building can praceed while the re1acatian af the <br />existing tenants is taking place and while the demalitian af the existing buildings <br />is camp1eted. All three buildings will have their best edges to. the street sides <br />which are the east tawards 35W and to. the sauth tawards Caunty Raad "DII. It is <br />prapased that the buildings will be used far affice warehause and affice showraom <br />type activities. <br /> <br />PLAN REQUIREMENTS <br />The building sizes, parking spac~~~,setbacks and required landscaped areas shawn an <br />the enc1ased site and landscape plans are all within City site plan appraval <br />standards. I wau1d nate that the plan shaws same dimensions that are slightly under <br />ar aver City dimensians far parking lanes and parking spaces, hawever, the actual <br />area is sufficient sa that all City standards can be met. The applicant has made <br />an applicatian to. the Rice Creek Watershed District far Watershed appraval and that <br />meeting will be held an March 23, 1983. Access to the site will be anly ane driveway <br />fram Caunty Raad "DII which will line itself with the existing semiphare an Caunty <br />Raad "DII. It is nated that the number af parking spaces shawn an the plans is <br />cansiderably abave what is narma11y required far industrial districts which is ane <br />space per 1,000 square feet af grass flaar area. Hawever, it is anticipated that <br />upwards af 40% af the actual building area will be al1acated far affice use. The <br />applicant an their plans have indicated that in figuring the affice space at the <br />affice requirement af 1 space per 200 square feet af grass floar area there wauld <br />still be sufficient parking spaces to. meet the city standards. <br /> <br />One cancern that daes arise in Phases 2 and 3 and the re1atianship to. Phase 1 far <br />purpases af parking, landscaping and cur5rin~.Zoning requires that cancrete curb <br />be replaced in areas up to. the frant wall line af structures and industrial <br />districts. When all three phases af the praject are campleted curbing wauld an1y <br />need be placed appraximate1y 40 feet an Caunty Raad "D" into. the site. With anly <br />Phase 1 building it could be argued that the applicant should pravide curbing all <br />the way to. the frant wall line (sauth wall line af Phase 1 building). The <br />Develapment agreement that is being negatiated is taking into. accaunt the ultimate <br />develapment 6~the site including items such as building size and 1acatian and site <br />plan standards. <br />