Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />.f <br /> <br />LP-89 <br />e Page #2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to,construct a split entry office building <br />adjacent to the e~istingoffice building. Because of the close <br />proxi~ity of the proposed building to the existing buil~ing,the <br />Building Inspector and Fire Department require that there be no <br />windows or doors, on the south s i de of th e proposed bu i1 din gand <br />the wi ndows and the door on the north si de of the exi sti ng offi ce <br />building"willbe closed off. <br /> <br />In addition the proposed building will have to have a two hour fire <br />wall on the south side and the applicant will have to piovide some <br />type of fire retardant shingles on the roof of the proposed building. <br /> <br />The appl i cant and Tyson Tru.cki ng have peti tioned the Ci ty to vacate <br />2nd Stre'et S.W. Approval of this building permit application will <br />have to be contingent, on the'approval of the vacation because with- <br />out the vacation a variance would "be needed for side street yard- <br />setback. ' <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />BOARD Of REVIEW ' <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 22, 1979 <br /> <br />John Steiner and Al Templin~ the applicants were present to answer <br />any questions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lang asked what the use was of the existing building <br />that would be attached to the proposed office. <br /> <br />The applicant stated that the firm is using that building for an <br />office now and prop6se the new office building to proVide room for <br />expansion. Theexisttngofficeis too small. <br /> <br />Motion by Schmidt, ~econd by Livingston to recommend approval of <br />LP-89 contingent on the attachment of the buildirigs being approved <br />by the Building Inspector, the approval of the vacation of 2nd <br />Street S.W.; on the conformaricewith site and landscape plans <br />s i gnedand dated by the appl icant and Ci ty Pl anner and the fi na 1 . <br />grading and drainage be submitted arid approved by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - o Nayes, motion carried. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the City approve LP-89 by simple motion <br />contingent on the closing. off of all doors and windows between the <br />