LP-094 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,^ .' I: ii ii RESOLUTION NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF REVIEW RES6LUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN APPLI,CATION FOR NON-CONFORMING USE PERMIT, NC-42 WHEREAS, An application fora non-conforming use permit, NC-42 has been made by Equipment Refinishing Services Company to construct an industrial building on a site with Type IV non-conformities. ii fi P II q H ,; n n !) H " P Ii !! ,; Ii i1 WHEREAS, The procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a non-conforming use permit, NC-42 was fi led, with the Ci ty on September 12,1979. 2. That the Bdardof Review heard and rev~ewed the application at its regular meeting on September 18, 197 3. The written comments and ana1ys.is of the City Planner and all person's statements made at the Board of Review meeting were, considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Boa~d of Review that the following Findings of Fact are made in respect to NC-42: 1. That the site has the following existing Type IV non- conformities: a. Fr'ontyard parking on a site in an industrial district. b~ lack of a dustless surface on driving areas and storage areas. c. Driveways exceed 36 feet in width. d. A110utstde storage is not screened from the public rig h t - 0 f - w ay.' , e. Equipment stored that exceed 6 feet in height is not setback as required. f. lack of concrete curbing along the driveways in the front yard. 2. That the applicant has addressed the non-conformities by proposing to install landscaping, con~rete curbing and reduce the number of front yard parking spaces. 3. That th~ intention of the applicant is not to eliminate the non-conformities,because the general operation of the business restricts the amount of landscaping in the front yard. 4. That the propo~a1 of the applicant will reduce the impact of the non-conf~rmities on adjacent properties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the application for NC-42 is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: :1 'f " l! I! i ;j !I iI !I !i II Ii ii II :1 'I ;\ !t " n 'j I, 'I I, n iI ii II Ii H 11 ii il n '! Ii Ii if l! H I' ii if :1 Ii " " " '; H !; :1 il j} il It d I' i! !I ;1 '! if !j !i 11 iI j! II i! It 11 1, I! 1. That the proposed landscaped areas be extended to the paved roadway; 2. That the site plan be r~vised to indicate the necessary parking spaces with the required dimensions and to depict the location of the stored vehicles; and 3. That the areas in the front yard not landscaped be paved. Adopted this day of , 1979. Steven, Schmidt,Cbat~man " il li ;j i ii H Ii 1! ,j ii' !. Joan Archer, City Planner '" .