Laserfiche WebLink
<br />* <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />LP-96 <br />Page #2 <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />entering this site because of such <br />traffic. At the time ofth~s report <br />,the County has not resolved this <br />concern. -Hopefully, by th~ time the <br />Board reviews the matter staff will <br />have additional information. An <br />aerial photo is attached to <br />familarize the Board wJth this <br />traffic concern. <br /> <br />C. Signage <br />That:some of the signs proposed for <br />the site do not meet code regulations. <br />Staff administratively issues permits <br />for signage.that meet code. Since <br />the applicant has not applied for a <br />sign variance, staff'will work out the <br />issue_of ~ignagewithtthe applicant. <br />,/ The. sign proposals are included:just <br />for your general information at this <br />time. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Bnard recommend~appioval ol LP-96 by <br />simple motion contingent on the following co~ditions: <br /> <br />1. That final 'grading and drainage' plans be approved by <br />the City Engineer; <br />2. That the County Engineer approve thelocati6n of the <br />driveway; ., <br />3. That the Council approve the necessary minor sub- <br />division; and <br />4. The confor~ancewith site a~d landscape plans be.,dated <br />and signed by.the applicant and City Planner. <br />. - <br /> <br />