Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />reqtilre an asphalt drive at least in the area of the future road <br />i.ti ord~r t.o provide loop back to 27th AVe. NW. <br /> <br />The dead end at the other end of the lot could be solved by <br />providing a similar type of connection to the apartment building <br />parking lot or.by moving the main driveway to the tennis club to <br />the north. <br /> <br />':['heVariance request is necessitated because a recent major <br />amendment to<the Zoning Code added the requirement (Section 10-080 <br />(b))' of .a50' setback fromR-ldistricts of a non-residential <br />building in,a.B-l district. The proposed structure would have a <br />151:setback.from the. R-l districts to the west and north. As <br />there will be park land on one side and garages on the other, this <br />would<not. s,eemtobe ca problem, although we would recommend that <br />one'qrtwo large trees be planted on each of those side in order <br />to break-up the expanse of blank wall which will exist. <br /> <br />No detailed plans of the structure have been prepa:red:as yet. <br />It is not possible to issue a building permit at this time since <br />there is no street and no utilities to serve the property. This <br />creates a minor problem in that variances and special use permits <br />expire in 180 days unless an extension is given. SinGe it appears <br />that construction will not be able to start within 180 days, the <br />Council might wish to extend this time period as a condition of <br />the variance and special use permit. · <br /> <br />R-82. Planninq Commission Recommendation - Dec. 18. 1974: <br /> <br />Motion by Aitken, seconded by Formell, to recommend rezoning <br />to B-1 rather than B-3 based on the Planning Commission's opinion <br />that this is a more appropriate use for the site and based on the <br />opinion that Section 8-010 (a4) permits a use such as that proposed. <br /> <br />Motion carried, 4-0 <br /> <br />Motion by Partyka, seconded by Aitken, to recommend rezoning to <br />B-3 only if the Council does not agree with the supposition in the <br />previous motion that the tennis facility may be permitted in a B-1 <br />district and oniy if the rezoning is tied to the tennis facility. <br /> <br />Motion carried, 4-0. <br /> <br />SP-53 Planninq Commission Recommendation - Dec. 18. 1974: <br /> <br />Motion. by Bohling, seconded by FormelL to recoIful1end approval <br />of Sp-53 with the follO\V'ing conditions: <br />