Laserfiche WebLink
<br />S P-5 5 <br /> <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />Pl~nnill~,commissio? Discussib~ <br />Allan HamnleJ;' appeared to speak <br />that the existing hduse on the <br />demolished. <br /> <br /> <br />(P-pril16, , 1974l: <br />iii favor Q.f. ~he application. He stated <br />sit-e will be removed, if. possible, or <br /> <br /> <br />In reply to a question by ,Parham,theBuil,ding & Planning Coordinator <br />st~ted that the house should probablyhavea.t least a basic inspection <br />by the Building ,.Inspector before it is moved. <br /> <br />Planninq CornmissionRecommenda-tion . (April' 16, 1974>-: <br />Motiqn by Parham, seconded by Harty ,to recommend approval of SP-505 <br />with the conditions thgt;, <br /> <br />1: Thehous,e qe brought into conformam:;e wit:h State /~uilding Code <br />requirements and that the city be compen~ated for the time the <br />. inspector spent in determining such conformance: <br /> <br />2. The existing house on the site should be moved or demolished <br />within three 'months of the date on which the new house becomes <br />ready for occupancy: <br /> <br />3 . The appl:i.cant be required to post a bond in an amount sufficient <br />to bring the new house up to Code, to cover demolition of the old <br />house and to guarantee the satisfactory repair of a~ycity <br />property or utilities damaged as a result of the house,moving. <br /> <br />4. That the applicant, for the house moving permit, satisfy the! City <br />that he has adequate insurance to protect the City and public fromh <br />any and all damage which might result from the house moving: <br /> <br />5. That all requirements of the Zoning Code be met. <br /> <br />Motion carried, 4-0 <br /> <br />