Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />'::'.'_" .-:'-,.....-,., c....:.-.,.:,'.'. ". .,:..."..::.,,'.:-: <br />tb,e action before)the COUrl9.i,+,'.l?egan.when '. the old <br />sigrtwasremoved and replaced with a new sign. He <br />stated that an overall sign plan should be generated. <br />He further stated the sign was too large and <br />tructed a window area of the building. <br />iIman Senden asked what other sign changes <br />Mr. Clark contemplated. Mr. Clark responded he <br />nothing specific in mind , <br />Mayor Bromander stated instead of looking at <br />oneata time on ,this property, there should <br />be an overall sign plan. <br />Mr. Clark stated this area ... is designated for renewal <br />it seemed senseless to spend a great deal of money until <br />further oecisions are made. Councilman Fisher pointed out <br />that no renewal areas had been designated. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Clark <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Various Councilmembers noted that they would like to <br />see the following information at the continued hearing <br />on May 11: <br />1. A sign plan reducing the number and size of signs; <br />2. Information regarding the worth of existing signs; <br />3. Proof of hardship and uniqueness of design. <br /> <br /> <br />Continue <br />May 11 - <br />8:03 <br /> <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by vJerdouschegg to continue <br />hearing to May 11 at 8:03 p.m. and to request that the <br />applicant prepare an overall sign plan for the property. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />