My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SP-069
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Special Use Permit File PLZ 02100
>
SP 001-100
>
SP-069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2007 11:48:05 AM
Creation date
2/7/2007 11:54:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />It would be an unnecessary hardship for me to move my <br />new sign. I installed it myself to cut down expenses, <br />ang the sign would have to be ruined to move it. <br />When I installed the sign I was under the false idea <br />that I could merely replace the old with the new. They <br />say the exact same thing. <br />I feel that my new sign is in the "spirit" of the new <br />sign ordinance in that something old and broken was re- <br />placed with something new and more attractive. The <br />old sign was itself not within the new code says in- <br />spector of buildings Don Peterson, because it had little <br />moveable metal reflectors that sparkled when the wind <br />blew them. The new sign is, I am told, within the new <br />code. <br />One thing that I cannot understand is how this sign <br />is refered--:;to as a roof-top sign when it is at least <br />10 feet below the roof. I would think that my sign <br />b:elongs in a diferent group, a legal group. <br />I made a costly effort to improve my business and in <br />doing so I sincerely feel I also improved the appearance <br />of old downtown New Brighton. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.