Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6' <br /> <br />Board of Review <br /> <br />Partyka' stated that he felt the above roof sign should be smaller. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark felt that if he had to remove or revise his sign, it <br />wouldbe'an extreme hardship. <br /> <br />Partyka noted that their options were to recommend ,approval, <br />denial, or recommend that a sign plan be developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated that he would like the issue resolved tonight. <br /> <br />Motion by Partyka, seconded by Harty, to recommend denial of <br />SP-69,that a sign plan be developed, "'<and that, the 'owner ofth~ <br />buildingehter in-Eothe a lication and be involved in any sign <br />plan ormu atibn. <br /> <br />Partyka indicated that perhaps a smaller sign similar to the <br />"Brighton Cleaners" sign might be acceptable. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stated that 3 years ago when the sign ordrnance was being <br />considered many of the businessmen were very concerned about <br />having to remove their signs. Mr. Clark stated that at that time <br />the Council told the businessmen not to worry and that the Council <br />would approve the signs. <br /> <br />Motion carried, 4-0 <br /> <br />.-------- ---- ~----- - -~. <br />