Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> <br />Pursuant to notice thereof, a special <br />held Tuesday, May 3,1988, at 7:30 p.m. <br />N.W. <br /> <br />meeting of the New Brighton City Council was <br />in the municipal building, 803 Fifth Avenue <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Benke, Councilmembers Brandt, Gunderman, Larson, and Williams <br />(arrived 4:43 p.m.) <br /> <br />Also <br />Present: <br /> <br />Henry Sinda, City Manager <br />Kevin Locke, Community Development Director <br />Erny Mattila, City Planner <br />Les Proper, City Engineer <br />Gary Berger, Administrative Assistant <br />Charlie LeFevere, City Attorney <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Locke reviewed action taken since the Council Meeting on Tuesday, <br />April 26, 1988: has worked with developer, bond counsel, fiscal <br />counsel, and attorneys. Locke feels they have developed a plan <br />that addresses the concerns by eliminating the seven-unit <br />apartment building, therefore moving the new construction (an 82- <br />unit building) back from the park property substantially from what <br />had been previously proposed. <br /> <br />To make that possible, Locke stated the city needs to amend the <br />development agreement to allow for additional up-front tax <br />increment assistance ($191,000.00) which the city would recoup <br />over twelve years by collecting 12 years' of tax increment (the <br />city would then have first rights of payment from the tax <br />increment this project generates). The existing mechanism for <br />site acquisition assistance calls for a payment in ten years of <br />annual payments (which would still remain) but those would only be <br />paid to the extent there was increment available after the city's <br />payments for the $191,000.00 had been made; the security for the <br />city is very high and the developer is taking the risk in exchange <br />for getting the additional assistance up front. <br /> <br />John Hefner, architect, reviewed the revised site plans; stated <br />the average setback is more than 30 feet; slightly twisting the <br />building is better as far as soil conditions are concerned; and <br />noted the fire lane is also shared with park. <br /> <br />Benke asked if there would be any problems, given the unique shape <br />of the property line near the park; Locke stated both options show <br />a 3D-foot setback from Tenth Street and the intent was to provide <br />that setback on both street sides of the project. <br /> <br />(Williams arrived at 4:43 p.m.) <br /> <br />Benke expressed concern about the liability of an accident on the <br />property line; Locke stated an ~greement will have to be drawn up <br />for the construction and maintenance. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Gray Siar <br />Corporation <br /> <br />LP-224/SP-147 <br />Report 88-134 <br />Resolution 88-44 <br /> <br />R-132 <br />Report 88-135 <br />Ordinance 563 <br /> <br />Amend Develop- <br />ment Agmt. <br />Report 88-136 <br />Resolution 88-45 <br />