Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />.'....-.---..-. --"-'__u.. ._> <br /> <br />"-';--' -...~~' -'- \......- .... <br /> <br />""-.-.....-;.. >~~,-~"'-,...,~ <br /> <br />0.....;.:;,-. <br /> <br />'~-.-:-v-_ "'~..,$-.,."':'":'..:""""oi;'; <br /> <br />-- <br />/' <br />" <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />CO:._. "IONS OF LA <br />I <br />The City of New Brighton Ordinance Section 10-140. <br />Exceptions, specifically excludes "radio and television ~owers" <br />from height limitations "unless in the opinion of the Building <br />Inspector such structure might be dangerous or in other ~ays <br />detrimental". There ~as no sho~ing of this, the testimony being <br />to the contrary. <br /> <br />II <br />The aforesaid Ordinance is vague in that it laCKS <br />specific standards for its application and subjects itself to <br />arbitrary and capricious enforcement and does not meet <br />Constitutional requirements. <br /> <br />III <br />To subject the defendant to the standards of the ;~cond <br />Orcinance (August 1981) after he had relied on the previous <br />Ordinance in 1979 .hen construction began, and having been <br />told the follo~ing Spring to complete construction and submit <br />documents .hich .ere approved and the structure found to be safe <br />and not dangerous would clearly be in conflict with the <br />~ post facto provision of the Constitution and would not stand. <br />IV <br />Attached and made a part hereof are Menoranda and a copy <br />of the applicable Ordinance marked Exhibit A. <br />V <br />The defendant is found Not Guilty as charged. <br /> <br />SO ORDERED <br /> <br /> <br />Dated: January 11. 1983 <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />,/ <br /> <br />~-""~-?-9-""l-~\.:oO''''''!'-___'''--, ~,,~ <br /> <br />~,.~.,,!, "::";':'.- ,;.''!<':- ':.;::';;' .......,../-~.,-~,':-<-.."'".~. ;,;!\.- <br /> <br />~~''''''':''~''~~';;~'';-~'~~_''~'<:: ;~~~"""'"'~"" <br />