Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />M <br />M <br />LO <br />~ <br />M <br />M <br />U) <br />. <br />N <br />~ <br />~ <br />Ln <br />Ln <br />c:{ <br />t- <br />o <br />en <br />w <br />Z <br />Z <br />:2: <br />, <br />z <br />o <br />I- <br />::I: <br />CJ <br />a: <br />co <br />~ <br />w <br />Z <br /> <br />~ <br />Z <br />w <br />::> <br />z <br />w <br />> <br />c:{ <br />~ <br />... <br />Ln <br /> <br />M <br />o <br />CO <br />Z <br />o <br />I- <br />::I: <br />CJ <br />a: <br />CO <br />~ <br />w <br />Z <br />u. <br />o <br />>- <br />t- <br />O <br /> <br /> <br />ew <br /> <br /> <br />Iri9hlOn <br /> <br />November 23, 1981 <br /> <br />Thomas Boudreau <br />660 23rd Avenue NW <br />New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 <br /> <br />RE: SP-99 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Boudreau: <br /> <br />This letter is a staff response to your letter dated <br />November 12, 1981. There appears to be two aspects to that <br />letter - <br /> <br />1. An indication that you will be out of town; and <br />2. That the nature of your request is changing. <br /> <br />It is staff's opinion that the consideration of SP~99 that <br />has been delayed twice already should be processed on the <br />basis of the safety issues. The Planning Commission hearing <br />scheduled for October l, 1981 was delayed to October 20, <br />1981 at your request for your personal convenience. The <br />application should have been then placed on the Council <br />agenda October 27, 1981 and was not at your request to be <br />placed on the 1st Council meeting of December. <br /> <br />Now you r No v em be r 1 2, 1 981 let t e r i n d i cat est hat you will not <br />be present for that December 8, 1981 meeting. Under normal <br />situations when there is no structure that has been erected, <br />the City policy has been to grant the necessary continuances <br />to work with the applicants. However, you have erected a <br />tower prior to the i~suance of any,permits and the special use <br />permit has been denied on the basis that it does not meet the <br />zoning code. bn that basis of safety and code ~ompliance, the <br />City Council in staff's opinion can no longer delay action on <br />the application. <br /> <br />Therefore, staff will place SP-99 on the December 8', 198J <br />agenda for consideration. The delay would have to be granted <br />by the Council;-not staff. <br /> <br />.) <br /> <br />u <br />