My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-068
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 001-100
>
VN-068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2007 1:32:11 AM
Creation date
2/15/2007 12:55:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br />DATE: July 21, 1970 <br />CASE NUMBER: VN-68 <br />APPLICANT: J. O. Koontz <br />LOCATION: Northeast quadrant of the Intersection of Highways 694 and Old <br />Highway 8 (See Map). <br />REQUEST: Variance to allow parking in front of building <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />The present zoning of the property in question is I-2 Light Industrial, under Section <br />10-090 AREA HEIGHTS FRONTAGE AND YARD REQUIREMENTS, INDUSTRIAL <br />DISTRICTS I-1 and I-2. A front yard setback of 40 feet is required. Further, para- <br />graph h of Section 10-090 requires that "...the front yard and~or any side yard <br />bordering on a street shall be lands Gaped and shal I not be used for parking" . <br />The property according to the description measures 340 feet by 50 feet and has <br />presently a substantial setback from Old Highway 8, 160 feet and the new addition <br />to the structure for which a permit has evidently been issued will bring the front line <br />of the structure to a 100 foot setback I ine. Assuming that this setback is measured <br />from the right-of-way line of the highway it is evident that this setback substantially <br />exceeds the front yard requirement for the zoning district. <br />It appears that the petitioners proposal is to provide a landscaped front yard area <br />which meets the 40 foot front yard requirement and provide parking space between <br />that area and the front of the business structure. If no other space on the parcel <br />can be used to provide parking area and this would appear to be the case, a legitimate <br />hardship could be found to exist. Under Section 2-700 definition of variance the <br />zoning ordinance indicates that a variance is not justified unless three elements exist <br />in the case. These are: (a) undue hardship, (b) unique circumstances, and <br />(c) applying to property. As a general rule a variance should be granted if the re- <br />fusal to grant such variance would deprive the property owner of substantial use of <br />his property. <br />It is recommended that if the variance is to be granted it be granted only upon the <br />receipt and approval of an adequate site plan and landscape plan showing the layout <br />of the parking lot and the landscaping of the required front yard area. Further it is <br />recommended that a landscape screening be provided between the yard and the park- <br />ing area to obscure the view of the parking area from the roadway. <br />/ v D ~t( - TG ~ /~CGf ~" C / . /G ~, ~SGc// !~ / ~t ri. .~w b Sc. /S S ~ ~ ~. <br />5,~~.~ r~uti ,~w~/~~,~y <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.