Laserfiche WebLink
VN-97 S'amros <br />"Feb 33 <br />P. 3 <br />Would, govern a sign ,at the proposed location according ,to the, standards <br />presented in the: report, "Proposed'Revision of the Village Sign , <br />Ordinance: A Street Graphics System for the Village of New Brighton."` <br />Moton'`Carred 5--0 <br />PROPOSED SIGN ST;ANDARDSs <br />The Community Betterment Task Eorce"Street~Graphics subcommittee has <br />'~ev~ewed the `subject" sequ~st in relat~xn to the proposed sign ordinance <br />and 'respectfully-submits the following gudelinese <br />1. The alLowab:Le maximum height. is based on the more>liberal <br />allowsno~s:"p~ovded by the=property, .abutment: on New Highway 8, <br />' That height-limtat~.on `is 22.fest. <br />2.- The allowable area .using the same guidelines is 90 square feet. <br />3. TYie maximum.-items. of information shah Abe 10. Elimination of the <br />-OPEN 24 HOURS," portion of the sign,coulc~, for instances, reduce <br />the items of information to below LO and would aid in obtaining <br />maximum allowable height of the identification portion of thee. <br />.sign. _ <br />4. The sign shall not utilize any moving or rotating parts nor `shall <br />it utilize flashing Lights. <br />In justification of adherence to the guidelines established by the. <br />proposed ordinance the following is submitted" <br />The physical location of the property does not justify unusual <br />considerations in .height and. area allowances. -The property is <br />over 1600 feet from 35W. The argument for needed free~tay visibility , <br />should be ,considered only in those cases wherein the property in~ <br />questions is within. 600-feet of any freeway. <br />., <br />ADMINISTRATIVE DISCUSSION: <br />The requested sign is 348 square feet in area.. This is 48 square .feet>}_ <br />more-.than-what would be allowed under the ordinance.. <br />'-Sambo's has indicated that it bas assign which is 221 square feet in <br />-area and 382 feet in height. This sign could be constructed without.- <br />need'of avariance provided-that the required 40 ft. setbacks from New <br />Trunk Highway No. 8, County Road D and Long Lake Road are observed..-lt <br />seems that Sambo`s intention at this time is to propose the smaller: sign <br />rather than the one first presented.. <br />-~ <br />-, _ <br />