My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-099
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 001-100
>
VN-099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 12:12:02 PM
Creation date
2/20/2007 11:30:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />village of New Brighton <br />Council Proceedings <br />Feb. 27, 1973 <br />The granting of any such variance should be <br />on specific site and landscape plans. None <br />The allowing of complete overdevelopment in <br />of expansion of existing development while <br />enforcement of the code on new development, <br />constitutional principles of fair and equal <br />under the law. <br />made conditional <br />are available. <br />the case <br />requiring strict <br />violates the <br />treatment <br />. 2 <br />Councilman Eagon stated for the record her reasons for voting naye: <br />Objected to the haphazard plan. <br />If variance was for parking in front yard for just the present <br />building, it does not designate the stalls to be used for <br />parking only and the stalls to be used for display purposes. <br />The petitioner was not present to answer questions <br />regarding clarification of the plan. <br />Councilman Eagon further stated she would want a green area <br />designated if we were to grant a variance. If the variance <br />is for parking for the present building and the proposed <br />building, would object to the variance on the grounds that <br />loading area was not properly shown on the plan, and the <br />stalls were short; 20 fewer stalls than could be required. <br />Manager stated hearing was properly called. <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Rebelein to receive <br />letter from Les-Brost, 2725 53rd Avenue North, <br />St. Petersburg, Fla, dated February 23, 1973. <br />5 ayes''- 0 nayes carried <br />Mr. James Balletine, representing Sambo's Restaurant and <br />Nordquist Sign Company spoke in favor of variance request <br />motion by Rebelein, seconded by Fisher to close <br />hearing <br />5 ayes - 0 naves - carried <br />Motion by Eagon, seconded by Fisher to grant approval of <br />VN-100 with a 25 ft setback from County Road D, <br />21 ft setback from New Highway 8, <br />30 ft setback from Long Lake Road, under the <br />conditions that the sign be no more than 80 square feet <br />in area; contain no more than 10 items of <br />information and have no flashing or rotating parts; <br />be no more than 20 feet in height and that the sign be <br />subject to plan reviewal by Building Inspector and <br />visual inspection by Building Inspector prior to <br />installation and that the setback be measured by <br />plumb dropped from widest portion of sign in relation <br />to the setback granted in variance. <br />4 a es - 1 na a 'Rebelein) <br />Q-iw00
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.