My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-01-12
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1988
>
1988-01-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:14:42 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 2:26:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--""',1 ill <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. . ' . I. '~~II I'l, ' <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 12, 1988 <br /> <br />Williams stated the Commission has a letter from Mr. McKenna that, <br />in fact, suggests consolidation (one unit of government in all of <br />Ramsey County); he will furnish Sinda with copies of McKenna's <br />letter. <br /> <br />Sinda suggested Stan Peskar, attorney for the League of Minnesota <br />Cities, speak to the League when the Commission is present on <br />citiesl viewpoints to explain ramifications. <br /> <br />Recalling the problems city council has keeping track of what is <br />happening in New Brighton, Benke wondered how the county would <br />consolidate all land use, planning controls, etc. (in trying to <br />attempt to apply a consistent code through the county); and stated <br />New Brighton needs to stay on top of it and be very active in the <br />process. <br /> <br />Brandt indicated the Commission is beginning to meet weekly and <br />the next meeting is at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 19, 1988, at <br />the County Courthouse. <br /> <br />Regarding the user fees feedback, Benke stated the Funeral Direct- <br />ors' Association is excited about our imposition of a fee for es- <br />corting funeral processions and they say we have applied a "death <br />tax". Benke suggested it be explained as a "fee for service" <br />which is applied relatively to all types of businesses in the city <br />for services from the city; funeral directors donlt provide their <br />services for free; we have to approach it from a business-like <br />perspective; we have suggested if they feel our fee is unfair, we <br />are willing to sit down and discuss the issue; but expects there <br />may be newspapers articles and phone calls. <br /> <br />K~lley discussed the fee with the Funeral Directors Association's <br />Executive Director, explaining it is a fee for an escort and if <br />his industry wishes to use it they can; however, there is nothing <br />in the state statutes that requires a funeral procession. Kelley <br />further stated that other communities handle escorts in a variety <br />of ways. <br /> <br />In questioning the legality of the escort services used by funeral <br />directors for processions, Kelley found citiesl traffic codes do <br />have the ability to regulate processions in their communities, <br />that they cannot prohibit motorcycles equipped with flashing red <br />lights to lead funeral processions (New Brighton's ordinance does <br />not state that). In talking to both staff at the command level of <br />the State Patrol and staff at the Minnesota Peace Officers Stan- <br />dard Training Board, a number of issues are coming up regarding <br />the escort services employees stopping traffic and dressing up and <br />appearing to be police officers; that may be highly illegal under <br />the Powers of Duties Act and Unauthorized Practices Act; under- <br />stood a law enforcement agency has been giving tags citing escort <br />services for not adhering to the letter of the law. <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />Funeral <br />Procession <br />Fee <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.