VN-100 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_ ~ N-1p0 - Sambo's February 27 Page 2 variance~in the setback requirements will be necessary, It appears that the-same conditions with regard to the property.., apply in the. .case of the sign hat were found with relation_to the cafe structure, PLANNING.CONIMISSI4N CONSIDERATIONS: February ?_0, 1.973 Petitioner was rep"resented`: by.James E. Ua~lentine, legal counsel .for Sambo's and'A1.Slarks of Nordquist;Sign Company. Motion by'Bohling, seconded by'`Partyka to recommend dermal of VN-100. Partyka stated that the petitioner could put the.sign in a,location where. it would ,conform to the required setbacks, -.but that the petitioner does not feel' these would be the x'ght `areas. Bohling s ~ated that after all the consideration given the proposed sign standards by the Street Graphics Subcommittee, he-does not-feel that he can vote in=favor of a sign violating those standards,. Loscheider stated that the size of the sign is not an iseue and that the-proposed sign standards are not releuant to 'the requested' variance. Motion failed, 2.-^...- ;PLANNING COMMISSION.RECOMMENDATIONS: February 20, 1973 .Motion by Daniels,- seconded by Loscheider to recommend approval of 'UN-100 with the comment that they do not approve-the sign configuration, :proposed. Motion carried 5-1 ADMINISTRATIVE DISCUSSION: There is only a small triangle of ].and approximately 3'9 x 5' x 6'3" which is not within a required setback area, nor overhung by the building roof. The sign-could be located .here without need of a setback variance. The sign will be approximately 20' in width and will overhang the required yard areas by approximately 8' - 10' on each sic?e. Section 14-030 (a) states that no sign shall project more than twenty-four (?4) -..inches across the-front ~rard or side yard setbacks, Therefore, a variance would be necessary .. It appears that .the proposed sign would require either a setback variance or a variance to allow the sign to overhang. the required yard areas. ,. It should also be noted that the property in question has an 8T wide ".boulevard along New Trunk Highway #8,: a 17~'.boulevard along Long Lake° Road and _a I5' boulevardalong County .Road D, -The proposed location for the sign seems to be about 20' from the front lat line `along~County Road D. This would put the sign..approximately on a line with the .nearby A & t~.Root.Seer Stand sign.