Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />December 22, 1987 <br /> <br />Locke reviewed the appraisal process and indicated that no offers <br />for Phase I had yet been made, and indicated appraisals for Phase <br />II would begin as Phase I nears completion. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Williams, to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF <br />A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WITH BRIGHTON PARK, INC. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Benke stated there are doubts about regional travel forecasts <br />which relate to trip assumptions and updating a data base; be- <br />lieves when the various proposals that have traffic impact are <br />presented, they should be presented with a traffic study that is <br />developed consistent with the process and parameters that have <br />been agreed to by the Metropolitan Council and the Department of <br />Transportation's planning staff. Benke has seen projects proposed <br />where assumptions have been made and variances from those agreed- <br />to parameters have not been documented and justified; and sugges- <br />ted some statements about those expectations be included consis- <br />tent with Metropolitan Council and MN/DOT guidelines and that <br />deviations be documented and justified. <br /> <br />Benke noted, because of council IS deferral of the Transportation <br />element, the goal for the completion of the Comprehensive Plan has <br />been delayed. <br /> <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Brandt, to DEFER RECEIPT OF THE TRAN- <br />SPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO JANUARY 12, 1987. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />In response to Benke's question, Sinda explained Sumek and Associ- <br />ates' proposal would be tailored to fit the specific needs of the <br />City of New Brighton following interviews with each member of the <br />council, department heads, and city manager. <br /> <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Williams, to UTILIZE SUMEK AND ASSO- <br />CIATES FOR TEAM BUILDING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING CONSULTING SERVI- <br />CES, PAYMENT BASED ON SERVICES RENDERED ON AN HOURLY BASIS; AND <br />SET THE INITIAL TEAM BUILDING AND STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP FOR <br />FEBRUARY 20 AND 21, 1988. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Benke explained he pulled the proposed resolution authorizing pur- <br />chase of printers and commitment of unused appropriation from the <br />Consent Agenda to speak to the need for the $9,000 for data man- <br />agement. <br /> <br />Egan explained the $9,000 was earmarked for software and training <br />in 1987 but staff had an excessive amount of work in 1987 and is, <br />therefore, asking that the dollars be carried over to 1988. <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Transportation <br />Element of <br />Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />Report 87-328 <br /> <br />Team Building <br />Report 87-331 <br /> <br />Purchase of Printer~ <br />and Commitment of <br />Unused Approria- <br />tions <br />Report 87-312A <br />Resolution 87-137 <br />