My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-127
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 12:18:27 PM
Creation date
2/21/2007 2:08:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Hearing <br />VN-127 <br />August 13, 1974 - 8:20 P.M. <br />Applicant: Harold Haines <br />Location: 50 Cleveland Ave. <br />Request: Variance from Sections 12-040 (e) and 12-060 (a) <br />to allow parking and driveway, areas without concrete <br />curbing <br />Ordinance Requirements Sections 12-040 (e) and 12-060 (a) state, <br />that all parking areas and `driveways' <br />shall have concrete curbs. <br />Number of Property Owners Within 200 feet: 4 <br />Discussion: <br />Curbing is proposed to be installed only bordering the land- <br />scaped area in front of the building. <br />The applicant's feeling is that his location relative to the " <br />overpass prevents the area from being seen, that semi-trailers <br />will probably be running over and breaking the curbs anyway, <br />and that there is a likelihood of future expansion requiring <br />removal of the curb. <br />It seems the main function of curbing was to keep vehicles <br />out of landscaped areas and that since adjacent areas are to be <br />left in their present natural state, curbs may serve little <br />function here. <br />Planning CourAssion Consideration (7-30-74) <br />The Chairman read the background discussions for VN-127 and <br />LP-7 <br />Ron Krank, architect, and Harold Haines were present to <br />answer questions. <br />The Board members discussed the question of whether painting <br />a super-graphic on the building was an architectural treatment <br />equal to the others specified in the ordinance. <br />Parham noted that the problem is the maintenance of the <br />painted walls. <br />=1-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.