Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br />.: <br />Y~ ~« <br />`~ r Council Proceedings ~~,~ ' 2 <br />;~'' ,,,~~ City of New Brighton ~ <br />~`f Autust 13, ::1974 <br />~' Motion .by Rebelein, seconded by Fisher to waive RESOLUTION <br />reading of resolution and to adopt resolution #1394'' <br />entitled RESOLUTION REQUESTING R.AMSEY COUNTY BOARD <br />' OF COMMISSSONERS TQ PLACE 4-~'~AYR STOP SIGNS AT COUNTY <br />j ROAD E AND.NEW BRIGHTON ROAD + <br />4: ayes - 0 n~'yes =carried <br />Motion by'Eagon, seconded by Anderson to receive letters <br />from J. M. Fisher,.-dated,August 9, 1974 and from <br />Alfred C. Anderson dated August 1.2, 1974 <br />4 ayes - 0 naves •- carried <br />Vote on tabled.motion from. July 23,• 1.974 -- Fence <br />Motion by' Rebelein, seconded bar Anderson to James~_ Shey <br />grant request•f4r.'60 inch fence <br />4:ayes - 0 Hayes -:.carried <br />Public Hearings <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called VN-x.17' <br />M~aion by Fisher:,.:.,..seconded by Rebelein to receive. letter <br />from Nolan~Brothers,:Inc, dated. August 6,'1974; 8:30 to <br />4 eyes 0 Hayes' - carried 8:31 <br />:Motion by Eagan,.. seconded. by Rebelein to close hearing <br />4 ayes - 0 Hayes;: =carried <br />Motion by Eagom, seconded by Rebelein to deny VN-117., <br />based.upon the applicant's: request to.withdraw <br />4 ayes - 0 Hayes'- carried <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called <br />Mr~ Wlliam;McNabola, 2029 1bA Street, <br />stated he had no `concern with the ool <br />p per se, VN-128 <br />his concern was ahe location of the pool and-what <br />was:the-front,yard. He.further added concern as: to. 8:32 to <br />what Jclnd of=fence that would be used and the. location 8:46 <br />of filtering ' egt~pment. He further expressed concern with <br />the soil condition in the area.- Mr John Lappen stated, <br />that he had.:a petition- of 15 .of 22 property. owners stating .they <br />hati no objeat,ions; ,5 of tY:e ..owners could- not be contacted. <br />He stated- that =the; fence at its .closest •-point to the== curb <br />would be 30 feet .:'.and would.: go back as .far as 65 feet <br />He-.:stated-he intended to .construct a rough sawn cedar slat <br />fence to match,:+what is on his house. He indicated that <br />present landscaping where the pool will,. be.located will be <br />.'relocated outside: of the fence. He further ,not.ed ,that th.e; <br />filtering. equipment would. be located,within the fenced area.:. <br />He stated he .would ,prefer 6 ft-fence rather. that 5 ft fend. <br />.;Motion by Fisher, seconded: by Rebelein to close hearing <br />4 ayes - 0 Hayes --..:carried <br />