Laserfiche WebLink
Council Proceedings <br />City of New Brighton <br />Sept 11, 1974 <br />Councilman Rebelein suggested the following changes: <br />1. Section 14-030 (9) - That candidates be required to <br /> remove campaign signs; <br />2. Section 14-120 (f) - That pylon signs on a frontage <br /> of less than 100 feet be <br /> permitted on a ratio basis; <br />3. Section 14-140 - That roof signs should be allowed <br /> with the same restrictions as <br /> ground signs; <br />4. Section 14-150 - That facts submitted at the hearing <br /> should be investigated; <br />5. Section 14-220 - Registration and Licensing be <br /> deleted. <br />Motion by Bromander, seconded by Eagon to continue <br />hearing to October 8, 8:05 p.m. <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called <br />Mr. J. Davis, area resident, stated he felt the house <br />proposed to be moved in would be too old for the <br />neighborhood. <br />Mr. Gordon Hedlund, petitioner, stated that the house <br />was 28' x 32', would be completely redone on the <br />inside, siding on the outside, a deck would be <br />provided, that a portion of the front of the building <br />would be brick and the house would have a tucked-under <br />garage. <br />Mrs. Robert Burrow, asked what kind of eaves and <br />windows would be placed on the house. Mr.. Hedlund <br />did not know specifically at this time. <br />Motion by Eagon, seconded by Anderson.to continue <br />hearing to September 24, 8:10 <br />4 ayes - 1 naye (Rebelein) - carried <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called <br />Mr. Al Otte, representing UOP Johnson, stated that the <br />sign could be placed farther back than the 15 foot <br />requested. He added that proposed building expansion <br />would come within 1 foot of the setback requirement. <br />Motion by Rebelein, seconded by Eagon to close <br />hearing <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes carried <br />Motion by Rebelein, seconded by Pnderson to find that a <br />hardship exists because of the large boulevard and because <br />of a potential need for fire lanes in front of the building <br />and to grant a 20 foot setback for the proposed sign rather <br />than 40 feet required setback <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />7 <br />Hearing on <br />Sign Ord <br />continued <br />Oct. 8, 8:05 <br />SP-56 <br />10;40 to <br />11:08 <br />Continue to <br />Sept 24 <br />8:10 <br />UOP <br />Johnson <br />11:09 to <br />11:27