Laserfiche WebLink
<br />d. The cwnor of the Innd repraOentccl 0-t thO tine of <br />division that thin parcal of land ?:oul.d bca <br />developed ,,ithout recd of variancca. <br />c. -khnt n building could be located on the parcel <br />rooting 4ill --oninq code requirements. <br />f. Tho requirad rriterizt for grnnting a varitnce do <br />not canint in that the h ardthip appl ier to the <br />propored une of the site vnd. not, the proporty. <br />g. That although:. the rppli.c«ant ben providcd <br />documcntw Lion tent the proposed pnrhzing sway be <br />tdcquate for the propoeed tare no ruarnntee htav <br />been prop idcd that if tho una changed in the <br />faxturc thoro would bo vdcclueto p,,;zltiirg. <br />h. lbat if the p rking wrte not vdequnto for tho <br />propocod uvo there io no Dccoptablo olternnto to <br />provide additional pnrhing. <br />J. That nppli,cnnt did On January 7v 1975 cub.-At a <br />revived plaza for development of the property. <br />Thin revived plan, boo not recolvod n prova.l but <br />it doev not require any vn.ri.ance. <br />Bn IT 'URIT"UM, RESOLVED, That the npplicntion for Vericance <br />Vi7-137 be nncl is haoreby denied for the follm,ing rensona s <br />1. Vint the criteria for n va.rianca ore not preoenti <br />2. Trott tho propony?od parking l:ne noyq?f¦{?oh nnl.??aA ly,o alternnto ?y <br />.cuff 1{?tw. ens for the pro oac <br />foiY or-panni?n and rnoy /.o ?F}• <br />uno a.nd/or canny subsequent unoz <br />3. That the owear of the property indicatcd no variance <br />vould be required for itc davolopr.ent n.t the timn ouch <br />pnrc al was crentedi. <br />Adopted thie 14th day of January 1975. <br />7, TTEST x <br />G ?ylc(5'. Broma11dert ranyor <br />T Tor a. Y'. LWv, pock, Onnager <br />VernOn C, pca,lerc.on, Clark-Trasanwror <br />(SEAL)