Laserfiche WebLink
vN-140. -5- July 22, 1975 <br />f <br />Mr. Don Walm'sley, 521 4th Ave. NW, notes that the property in,: <br />question was, originally zoned residential. and ~•*~c ~'~~^-~''' *~^ '% <br />Indus rial approximately 15 years age Qc,ox~ the Apposition or <br />the area residents. He noted that they are now being asked; to give <br />up".the protection of the buffer.:strip-and stated his objection to <br />.this request: <br />509. 4th Ave. NW, stated his opposition to <br />Mr. Norman Brunn, <br />granting the 2S f`oot buffer strip and, stated that he was in favor <br />of maintaining the bufferstrip at 60 feet. <br />In replies to questions regarding the hours of operation, <br />'Mre Dahlke noted that .they are open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM and <br />.that :they .,may be open on saturdays. ~ <br />Bohling asked if the applicant had talked to the property owner. <br />to the south regarding the possibility of buying additional " <br />property in-that location in order to be able to provide the 60 <br />foot"buffer strip. <br />Mr. Dahlke stated that he had not. <br />Bohling stated that he appreciated the good. faith effort shown <br />by the applicant in revising his plans but that. he would like to <br />go farther and see if the property-can be developed without a <br />variance. <br />At the request of the Chairman, the~Building and Planning Coordinate , <br />. explained that under City ordinances a property developed according <br />to code can provide ~ 60 foot landscaped-strip which contains no <br />landscaping other than seeding or sodding and that this may not <br />provide an adequate buffer. <br />Mrs. Carol Walmsley, 5214th Ave. NW, stated that the property ` <br />could be as attractively landscaped as is proposed still having the <br />60 foot.-buffer strip. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation 7-15-75: <br />Motion by Anderson, seconded by Fredrickson, to recommend <br />approval of VN-140 with the following conditions: <br />