Laserfiche WebLink
s <br />-3- August 12, 1975 <br />VLF-142 <br />Chairman Parham noted that it would not be necessary to regain <br />the whole building bu.t rather simply paint the .part of the building <br />where the non-conforming signs are located. She suggested tha-t <br />per~zaps the time. within which this should. be done could be linked -~:~ <br />the-amortization schedule that was at one timb included in the drat <br />of the proposed sign ordinance. She suggested that a 15 month <br />period for removing the non-conforming building signs might'be <br />appropriate.' <br />Mr. Kuluvar-suggested that if this was the Planning Commission's <br />desire, that they-state November 1,.1976 in the motion as the time <br />by which'. the non-conforming building signs are to be removed. <br />The Building-and Planning Coordinator noted that not all non- <br />conforming signs on the existing building can be removed simply by <br />painting. He noted that-there is a sign on the front of the building <br />wh~.ch extends beyond the outline of the building that wou d have to: <br />b~ removed. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation (July 15, 1975): <br />Motion By-Bohling, seconded by Fredrickson, to recommend <br />approval of VN-142 on the condition that: <br />1. T'ne existing billboard on the property be brought into <br />conformity within 90 days of approval of the variance. <br />2. All othersigning on the property be brought into coizformance <br />with the ordinance by November 1, 1976; with the intention of <br />the Board of Review being to have the nor.-conforming sig:~s <br />painted .out where this is possible. <br />Motion carried 4-0 <br />