VN-149 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r_ - ~'~ However, the County feels that there is a necessity for the - additonal right-of-way. on a'major read such as this, The secand concern which we raised at the Planning Commission meeting was not-specifically in ..regard to this.partcular-parcel, but in regard to the de~relopment'pattern for the block as a whole. We` raised the su.gg~soon. that the possibility of running a cul--de- sae into the center of this block be considered at this. time, partly because of this request but largely because of a proposed plat along the southern°boundary of the block, This issue. has` apparently been discussed in the'past and: apparently the residents- in the aroa` have not favored `cons tru.ction of a cul-de-sac -and continue to oppose such a proposal. In any case the construction , of the cul-de-sac could take-'place urthout involving the property in'ques ion, so. we feel the 'variance and the property division could be approved no ma ter attitude we might-take. eventually toward. development on he rest of the block. Lastly, in many, cases 'we have attached a condition to the ;:approval of varanees`on u:ndersizea lots that no future. variances will be granted-from zoning code. setbacl~ requirements. We suggest ghat thus condition be considered again in thin case'. Both of the lots created by the property division, while they will have an adequate: width, will have. much more than the necessary 10,000 square Feet of lot area Planning Commision Consideration, 9-16-75: Mr Bochenski was .present and indicated that he had read the back- - ground discussion so the review of this discussion was by-passed.. Mr. Bochenski stated that he unshed to have"a large deep lot and did not wish to see the land replatted in any other .form. Planning, Commission Recommendation, 9-1~-75e Motion by Partyka, seconded by Fredrickson, to recommend approval of VN-1~-9 con3itioned on the-dedication of a ten-.foot (10' } stree'c easement on Long Lake Road such recommendation veing based on the. precedent established by previous lot splits in the area,.. on .the fact that both lots remaining ~idil'1 have well over 10,000 square feet of urea,: and' on the fact of the extreme depth of the present 1o,t . . :Chairman .Parham stated that she does not object to the variance bt~t that she would like to see the option for creating 10,-000 square foot lots. through possible future replatting. Wickland stated that he has similar feelings but does not quarrel with the .desire cif the applicant fora large lot. 3 Ayes - 2 Nayes ,(Wickland, Parham)..- Motion Carried