VN-150 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~,~~: Partyka asked if there would be any problems in simply making the signing on the property totally confor~nn~~ to the ordinance. .• The Building and Manning Coorc?inator stated that.this could be done except that aslight problem would be caused to the businesses iiz th~~.t the ordinance allows .only one wail sigr. for a .bus mess in u building of multiple occupancy, even:tl~ough it may he cn a corner. In this case, both tenants would want. ai.gns pn hotly s~creet sides of the building, He stated that it may be reasonax~le in this case to allow. a gall sign for each business on each. street side ber_ausc~ of the design of the building having entrances on each street sd:e.' He suggested, hoc ever, that the Planning Commission must considex-~ not wily ma.>;:ing the furniture store sign..conforming but also the situationwith the signing of the. corner bar. He noted that the corner bar derives an economic benefit from leasing to a tenant who. requires additional signing and that approval of the additional signing for the furniture story may he riving special privilFgc to the owner of the building ?.f the bar signing is not required Ito be reduced. ~.-- Motion by inTic;tland, seconded by Bohling, to recommend approval of ' VN-157, subject to: 1, Allotring the sign reading "Nesr~ ~3righton Furniture, -Inc. " '"' bn each street side of the building, said sign meeting the ..limit of covering of nor more than n.g% of the selected signable area. '2. Removal of the wall sign ,.above the entrance on the south:. side of the building. 3 Removal of the projecting sign anc~ wall sign over the door to Ec?die's Corner Bar. ~. Allowing the existing wall signs on each side for Eddie's Corner Bar to remain but to reduce them to saying. only "Eddie's Corner Bar". - Y - - 5. Permanent window signs must be made conforming to thn. ordinance' limitation on' -items of information. 6. Ground sign on the property be removed. 7. The ~--1 TeV. Service V~all sign to be removes?.