VN-152 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- Board of Revie.~a -'~- Dec. 16, 1975 Mr. Nattel stated. that he has spice for ten cars.. Parham suggested that a wall sign conforming to the size limits in the ordinance be allowed such sign saying "Customer Parking for Edc~ie's Corner Bar and New. Brighton.Furniture". Tr~Tith regard to. item number seven, .Harty noted that this item was ...already taken care of, The Planning Commission returned to a discuss-ion of item number three. Mr. Rybak stated that he can't agree to"take the. sign down since it is the `only way people know he is,open, He stated he will never take it`down. The Building and Planning Coordinator asked what the. possibility cans ofexternally lighting'theeexistingwall signs. Mr. Nattel stated that thin would not work, that the bar depends ~_ on being visible to,the-existing four way traffic anc~ that the bar signs `lighted as proposed would not be visible to the traffic from ail directions. ~~?otion by Parham-, seconded by Anderson, to recommend approval of VDT-.152 with the. follo~•~ing .conditions.. 1, ,Allowing the sign reading ;"New Brighton Furniture, Inca" on ~o -, n. 5e each. street sa.de of the building said sign meeting the. limit of covering no more than ~'-0% of the selected s ignable area . Removal of the. existing wall'sign above the entrance on the south side of the building and replacement by a sign meeting ordinance requirements as to size and-saying "Main Entrance". Removal of projecting sign and E~ia11 sign over the door. to Eddie's Corner Bar.`` Allowing the existing wall signs. on each si~.e-'for Ec?die's Corner Bar to .remain. but to reduce them to saying only "Eddie's Corner Bar" anc~ the 7-Up logos. - ;- ,; Permanent windo~~ signs must be mace conforming to the. ordinance 1 limitation on items of information. ~'