Laserfiche WebLink
_ •~. <br />• Basic Design Elements. Code regulations, however, classify off- <br />premise signs as billboards, and billboards are permitted only in <br />business and industrial districts w::ich are abutting on freeways. <br />Section 14-020 defines a billbozrd as: <br />''c. Billboard. A sign erected and used for the primary purposes <br />of advertising products, goods or services other than those <br />offered on the premises of the sign." <br />Code requirements state that any deviation from the regulations <br />found in Chapter XIV can only be accomplished via the variance <br />procedure. This is the nature of the applicants request. Section <br />14-220 Variances outlines the elements of sign variance requests as: <br />(1) Practical difficulities <br />(2) Unnecessary hardship <br />(~) Or, if results inconsistent with the general purpose of <br />Chanter 1'IV would otherwise occur. <br />In addition, there must be special circumstances involving size, <br />shape, topography, etc., attached to the property in question. In <br />consideration of these elements, the granting of the variance shall <br />not constitute a special privilege. <br />In response to these elements the applicant has indicated that <br />as a result of their somewhat hidden location, sale of the available <br />new homes and lots has been severely restricted. <br />Our concerns for this matter include one, that the conditions <br />are present to warrant the variance; two, that the actual sign not <br />be unsightly in terms of size, shapA, or color; and throe, that the <br />location not obstruct the view of traffic. <br />In regards to the warrants f_or the variance, attention is <br />directed to the applicants statement pertaining to the need of the <br />signing. We would note that this particular case is similar to <br />other developments in New Brighton vahere the lots and homes are <br />not readily visible from a major road. <br />The sign, a~ depicted on the drawing, does not appear to be <br />particularly offensive. Of more concern is the proposed location <br />for the sign. The setbacks as shown would be 10' from the Long Lake <br />Road right-of-way and 25' from the Poppyseed Drive right-of-way. <br />We would suggest that if the variance is approved, that the sign be <br />• located slightly further to the east. This would eliminate any <br />possible obstruction at the intersection. <br />