Laserfiche WebLink
F~ <br />;'~uncii Proceed~r..ns <br />pity of New Brighton <br />June 22, 1976 <br />Councilman Senden stated tizat h~ felt_there were real. <br />inistrative report <br />d,r <br />~ <br />traffic problems in the area but that an a <br />~ closing <br />d b• <br />~, <br />had also noted problems that would be create <br />unc <br />C <br />t <br />d <br />o <br />Pa1_mer Driven He stated that he felt .the <br />the <br />s in <br />estion <br />t other Bugg <br />th <br />a <br />want to close Palmer Drive but <br />d not been completely researched. <br />h <br />a <br />administrative report <br />Council should dispose of the <br />lt the <br />f <br />. <br />e <br />He further stated he <br />f road closing and direct further study of other <br />guest.ion o <br />alternatives. Fie stated that he also felt a public hearing <br />Adm. to <br />was needed in order to get citizen. input. Prepare <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Fisher to direct administration <br />77-3 based <br />Resolution <br />: <br />to prepare a resolution initiating Improvement <br />on the Planner':s alternates 3 and 6. <br />Motion. by P7erdouschegg, second~:d by; Senden to not <br />limit the contents of the resolution to alternates <br />3 and 6 <br />Motion withdrawn <br />vote on main motion ~A ~ _ carried <br />s (~•~erdouschegg, ~~nc.en) <br />2 <br />nave <br />3 ayes. - <br />Public He~ri_n~,s Prl called <br />Attorney stateu hearing remained prop_ Y <br />i ~~~-157 <br />Billman <br />ve <br />on by Vderdouschegg, seconded by Senden to rece <br />!`-'Ioti <br />. <br />letter from Rodney Billman dzted ~7une 16, 1970• <br />9:45 to <br />5 ayes - 0 naves - carried 9°47 <br />No one spolco regarding the application <br /> <br />conded by FisY_er to continue <br />Cor_tinue <br />Motion by i-uerdouschegg, se July 13- <br />hearing to 8.01,. July 13, 1976 8.O1 <br />5 ayes- 0 naves - carried <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called. <br />d <br />The City Planner reviewed the planning report an VN_156 <br />the Planning Commission recommendations. E-Z Mini <br />Charles Nolan, representing F-Z Piini Storage, <br />I~ir Stora e <br />° <br />provided a past history of development and signing on <br />further <br />i _~_~~_~ <br />n <br />the property. He stated he had no interest <br />lt that safety and <br />t f 9048 to <br />e <br />signing_,or advertising, per se, bu <br />He stated the private <br />mmodated 10:36 <br />. <br />convenier_ce had to be acco <br />and a'pout impossible to distinguis <br />t lon <br />f h <br />g <br />ee <br />drive was 1.,000 <br />d that people believed that the private <br />W <br />an <br />from 3rd i-,venue L~7 <br />continuation of 3rd Avenue. He further state <br />s d <br />a <br />driveway wa <br />rn with any changes to the freeway sign in terms of <br />conce <br />the effect it might have on his business. <br />'Councilman Hardt asked if it were true that only the <br />lower panel on the freeway sign was nonconfoxx~ing. <br /><Mr. Nolan respondedth~t was correct. <br />