My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-161
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:58:29 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 11:42:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y c <br />RESOLUTION NO . 17 8 7 <br />STAi'E OF MINI~SOTA <br />COUNl'Y OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF NEW BRIQ~'PON <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT,-and denying application for VN 161. <br />~~REAS, an application for-:variance-entitled VN 161 has been made to <br />the City.and said application has been processed. and reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission at its meeting on September 21, 1976, and heard and considered <br />by the Council at a public hearing on September 26, 1976, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Brighton.City Council <br />makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to VN 161: <br />FINDINGS OF FACT: <br />1. That an application for VN 161 was filed with the City and was. <br />heard and reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting on September 21, <br />1976; <br />2. That the City Council, pursuant to published and mailed notices, <br />held a public hearing on September 26, 1976, to consider the application. The <br />applicant and other persons present at the hearing were given opportunity to <br />be heard;. <br />3. The written comments and analysis of the City Planner, the <br />Planning Commission Minutes and recommendations and all persons' statements <br />made at the public hearing were considered including the statements of the <br />applicant and members of-the Council. <br />BE IT FUR`l~R RESOLVED that the application for VN 161 be hereby <br />denied for the following reasons: <br />1. That no undue hardship shown by the applicant at the Planning <br />Commission meeting or at the public hearing. <br />', 2. That the subject property was not shc~m to be unique and no other <br />unique circ-~m~stances were shown to be present. <br />3 . That the New Brighton Zoning Code provides for 1 imitation ~ f <br />intensity of the 1€~nd development ~Y the legislatively determined <br />~floor~area-ratio requirement. <br />4. The floor-area-ratio is legislatively provided as a Zoning Dis+.sict <br />Standard applying uniformly to all properties in the district, independent of <br />use or other factors. <br />5. The floor-area-ratio, as legislatively provided, determines the <br />ultimate parcel density and hence determines parcel value. <br />6. The floor-area-ratio is by its inherent nature, as a ratio, com- <br />pletely nondiscriminatory allowing any and all properties in a given zoning <br />district to be developed in proportion to size. <br />7. That theZ7nited States Constitution pursuant to the Fourteenth <br />Amendment requires that zoning administration be conducted to provide equal <br />treatment to all those similarly situated with respect to the law. <br />8. That it is a finding of the New Brighton City Council that equity <br />of treatment of all those similarly situated acquires uniform enforcement of <br />floor-area-ratio to all parcels within a given zoning district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.