My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-166
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:48:22 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 3:02:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~' <br />- q. - <br />_. - <br />VN-166 -2- <br />`of undue hardship and unique circumstances must be, present to <br />justify the valiance. <br />The Zoning Code regulates land use unformally in specifying <br />'. minmumlot widths and areas. In-this case, it is obvious <br />that all Code r-eauirements .could be satisfied ' if this parcel <br />were platted into only 3 lots. As the parcel can `be platted <br />to meet all requirements, there may-be ~ question of whether-.the <br />hardship is`related to the land, apart from economic concerns <br />or desires.` The uniqueness of the property may also be..questioned <br />as there are no .existing structures, marsh areas, es~treme topo- <br />graphical differences or .irregular property lines. As noted,. <br />the applicant has indicated that the property is unique in that <br />it"has access only off of 8th St. This access may be a valid <br />concern. In the discussion for PL-108 it is noted that the <br />four lots created would be extremely deep and that this may not <br />be the most efficient use of land. It is furthEr indicated. in <br />_that discussion that while acquiring additional land or securing <br />access from 11th Ave.' may be preferable and may permit <br />more efficient land use, those are factors over which the applicant. <br />may have little control. <br />It should also. be noted that both the Board of Planning and <br />-the Housing and Redevelopment Authority have been discussing the. <br />inclusion in their plans of a policy calling for anew single <br />family residence zoning districet that would require smaller lot <br />areas and widths than the present ordinance. The intent is that <br />this district would be used in the. older area of town where typical <br />lot sizes are smaller than the present ordinance requirement iri order. <br />to remove the need for variances in order to build on these lots. <br />Neither group has defined a specific area where this new zoning <br />district should apply. There is no implication in this discussion. <br />that the property in question would be proposed to be within this <br />new zoning district. <br />Additional comments regarding this request may be found in the <br />`discussion for PL-108.... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.