Laserfiche WebLink
..~:; <br />- i <br />-: <br />,_ <br />Board of Review -2- Dec. 21, 1976 <br />`Brown asked why`the Herbst want to-buy Txact B. <br />Mr. Swenson explained that 'there is 'merely the-opportunity to purchas::: <br />the parcel at this time and it would be usable property .when they <br />larger:Her3~st site is .developed. <br />Wick land questioned whether additional right-of-way could be <br />acquired for a public road. <br />The City Planner noted that Mounds View is also interested in <br />creating a public road in this area, though it may not be possible <br />for Mounds View to acquire land for.such a road.. <br />Bohling asked if it was urgent for the variance to be acquired. <br />Bohling stated that he felt there were some unanswered questions <br />invol~ring the City of Mounds View. Bohling indicated that ..the <br />Planning 'Commission should be concerned with the overall prc:blems <br />of access to the Herbst property. , <br />\_ <br />Wickland noted-that this request will not change the situation <br />regarding access to the Herbst Property. <br />Motion by Wickland, seconded by Brown, to recommend. approval of <br />VN-168 in that this change in property owners has not changed the. <br />eventual problem of having to construct a road to service .the Herbst <br />property. Further, it has neither increased or decreased the <br />difficulty in providing the road. In addition, the hardship has, to <br />do with the existing platting of the land-and the lack of road access <br />to a large area of land. <br />Bohling asked 'if the applicant could provide the warrants for the <br />variance. Bohling stated he wasn't sure a hardship existed. <br />Partyka noted that he also had a problem with establishing what thee: <br />hardship is in this. <br />Brown stated that he did .not think this request was a detriment to' <br />the public welfare or impairing-the intent of the platting regulation <br />