Laserfiche WebLink
\. <br />:'M. - ~. <br />\ - <br />- ~ <br />VN-171 -2- <br />6. The applicant has indicated that the street_(valiey View`; <br />Lane): was put in at a hgher:elevationthan was anti- <br />cipated at the time of platting resulting in an extreme <br />drop of about 20 feet to the rear of a normal house with <br />the standard setback. <br />7. mheapplicanthas ind::cated that a petition has'been signed <br />~~ by neighboring residents in favor of this xequest. <br />AnalVszs <br />Tn looking at this request, it could perhaps be sac3.that the <br />property is somewhat unique given the topography and creek. The <br />applicant has also indicated that the design and cast of a home <br />'meeting the setback requirement would be costly, if not prohibitive. <br />Further, the applicant has further noted that meeting the setback. <br />requirement would leave virtually no useable backyard.. The appii- <br />cant's`contentions may be valid given that what wcauld-seem to be'~:a <br />highly desirable lot has remained vacant for over six years. <br />Another circumstance that may be relevant in this ease is the <br />fact that this lot is located at the end of the cul-de-sac making <br />the encroachment perhaps less visible. <br />Planning Commission Consideration & Recommendation (5/17/77): <br />Please See Attached .Sheet <br />