Laserfiche WebLink
t rocee ings <br />~~of New Brighton /vII~GG-~ g~ l9~"7 <br />.C <br />ch 8, 1977 <br />t-- - _. <br /><Public Hearings <br />,~~'Assistant City Attorney stated the hearing was <br />~~ properly; called.; ~~ VN-170 Dahlke <br />The City Planner .reviewed the: planning report and <br />Planning Commission recommendation's 7:59 to <br />~`~ Councilman Werdouschegg .inquired as to what the 8:25 <br />footage was :along I-35W'and I-694. <br />'~' The Planner. indicated that he`did not have that <br />figure available;, however,,.. in order .to make the <br />property'conformng as to the billboards, ,they all would have <br />'to be reduced in size, the western billboard would have <br />' to be removedand one of the two, eastern billboards would <br />have to be removed. <br />'Councilman Werdouschegg asked what was to be done with the <br />windows on the south side of the .office building. ` <br />'The. Planner :responded that they were_`to be removed and replaced <br />with. similar material as the exterior of the building..' <br />Elton Dahlke, applicant, was present.: <br />Councilman'Hardt inquired as to whether Mr. Dahlke was , <br /><in!agreement with the Planning Commission conditions. <br />Mr. Dahlke stated that they-appeared to be reasonable; ; <br />however, he `would. like a sign covering 22.5 per cent <br />of the signable area on the .south wall of the office ~ <br />bu 'ld ing . <br />Mayor Bromander asked what the purpose of the temporary- <br />ground sign was. <br />Mr. Dahlke stated the temporary sign. was to be used <br />pending-completion of the landscape work and noted that the <br />sign would be set back the required setback distance.. <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Senden to close hearing. Close Hearing <br />4 ayes.- 0 nayes- carried <br />Motion by Werdouschegg to direct administration to prepare <br />resolution denying VN-170 for the following reasons: <br />1. The-wall sign is out of proportion to-the office <br />building and repair shop. <br />2. The. sign on the repair shop is too large and is <br />not within the spirit of the existing sign ordinance. <br />3.` That although hardship is present due to .the location.- <br />' of the buildings, the building could be alternated to <br />provide larger signable areas.' <br />Motion failed for lack of a second <br />