VN-174 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~:` New`- Brighton ,per 25, 1977 ,(~,; The City Attorney stated .properly.. called, OG~.~ s~ i~77 the hearing was The City Planner reviewed. the administrative report and Planning Commission recommendations. The City Planner informed the Council that the applicant had indicated he .was-not able to attend the meeting. "" Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to continue public hearing on NC-24 to November 9 at 8:15. 5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried The City Attorney stated the hearing was properly called. The City Planner reviewed his report and the Planning Commission recommendations. NC-24 '- Clnch-on- Corners Continue to Nov.'9, 8:15 vN-174 PL-111 9:46 to Councilman Werdouschegg asked the :City Planner what the 10;24 Planning Commission reasoning was;for`recommending- thaw Lot 5 be developed so that the :home faced 7th Street. The: Planner responded that the Planning Commission was" concerned for the number of accesses onto Old Highway 8 andfelt that it was necessary.-to-maintain a clear view area at the intersection of 7th Street and 5th Avenue. Councilman'Werdouschegg asked if: it were possible to square off the rear property :line for lots -1--and. 2. The Planner replied. that the property line .could be redrawn but that given the shape of the: parcel atleast- one of the lots would have a slight protrusion creating somewhat unusual property lines. Jim Cepress, applicant, was present to answer questions. Eugene. LaRue,-property. owner-to the north, stated that. while he did not object to this property being developed, he felt the `57-.foot lots along 5th Avenue,were.not ' compatible ;witYi the size .lots in the area..and felt that the `40 foot lot adjacent to 6th Avenue was considerably too small 'to be built on.