My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-174
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:17:07 PM
Creation date
2/26/2007 12:50:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 1960 <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY Ok° RAMS EY <br />CITY Off' NEk+; ~RIGrITC1N' <br />RESOLUTION A'~AKINC E'I~TDIN'GS Off' FACT AND LIENYING .~PP~,xCATIONS <br />FCR V~iR.ZANCE Vi~T-174 P,ND Pk2ELIMINARY PT.~T PL-111. <br />k~TH.~REAS, applications for a variance VN-174 and a <br />preliminaty plat PL-111 have been made by Dynamic Developers, <br />Inc. to permit the platting of lots less than 75 feet in <br />width and less than 1fl;000 square feet in area, and <br />~+iHEREAS the procedural history of the applications is <br />as follows: <br />1. That applications for VLm-174 and .PL==-17.1 were <br />filed with the City on September 13, 1977 and <br />were heard and reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission at its meetings of ueptember 20, <br />1977 and September 28, 19??; <br />2. That the City Council, pursuant to published <br />and mailed notices, held a public hearing on <br />October 25, 197? to consider the applications. <br />All persons present at the hearing were given <br />an opportunity to be heard; <br />~. The written comments and anaiys is of the City <br />Planner;; the Planning Commission minutes and <br />recommendations, and all person's statements <br />made at the public hearing were considered. <br />NOG~7 THEREFORE I3E IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City <br />of New Brighton, that the Council hereby makes the following <br />findings of_ fact in respect to V~;-7.74 and PL-1.11: <br />1. That no undue hardship has been shown through <br />the application; <br />2. That the property has not 1^een shown to have <br />unique circumstances; <br />3. That the property adjacent to 5th Avenue could <br />be divided into standard sued lots; <br />4. That platting in the manner proposed would <br />create undersized lots; <br />~,. That without the public hearing on the <br />comprehensive plan and within the structure <br />of the present ordinance, approval of the <br />variance would constitute special privilege <br />and tYaat it would result in the over develop- <br />ment of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.