Laserfiche WebLink
The impact of the request on adjacent property must also be <br />considered and in this case a number of factors may be relevant. <br />First,. the applicant has indicated that their father has no <br />objection to the request. Second, their father's home is <br />located approximately 310 feet from Old Hwy, 8 which places <br />this home approximately 190 feet from the proposed garage. <br />Thirdly, the applicant has indicated that arrangements have <br />been made to eventually transfer their father's property to <br />he greenhouse. As such, it may be possible if the variance is <br />approved, to attach a condition that a certain amount of the <br />adjacent property be added to the greenhouse property at .time of <br />.transfer. <br />~~7e also discussed the possibility of a mallet garage but the <br />applicant has indicated that the space is needed for efficient <br />.loading . <br />Tf the recommendation''is"to approve we would suggest that any. <br />conditions made part of this non-canf orming use permit and <br />building permit be conditions of the variance. <br />Planning Commission ConGideration and Recommendation(1'1/1577;7) <br />VN--176,... NC-25,` LP-57-- Pletscher Greenhouse, .Inc. <br />The Director of Community Development noted that-this item was <br />continued 'from the previous meeting. <br />Commissioner Doyle stated that the item was not discussed at <br />that time but was simply passed over. <br />No one appeared.. to :represent the applicant. <br />Commissioner Doyle noted that the 10 foot-driveway north of the <br />building was inadequate. <br />The Crector of Community Development noted that access to-the <br />proposed addition to the north would also be inadequate because. <br />of thislimited space.. He suggested that it might be possible <br />to design the addition with-doors accessing t'o the east and <br />that perhaps the addition could also he expanded i.n that <br />direction if that werenecessarv. <br />