My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-189
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2007 10:34:41 PM
Creation date
2/27/2007 4:57:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NQ. <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING VARIANCE <br />APPLICATION VN-189. <br />WHEREAS, an application for a variance VN-T89 has <br />been made by Rollin Hansen to permit construction of a home <br />with less than the required thirty (30) foot front yard set- <br />back, and <br />WHEREAS, the procedural history of .the application is <br />as follows: <br />1. That an application for a variance VN-189 was <br />fi-led with the City on July 12, 1978. <br />2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed <br />the application at its .meeting on July 31st, 1978., <br />3. That the City Council pursuant to published and <br />mailed notices, held a public. hearingon~Augus 8, <br />1978, to consider the application. ,All persons <br />present at the public hearing were given an <br />opportunity to be heard. <br />4. The written comments and analysis- of the City <br />.Planner, the Planning Commission minutes and <br />recommendation, and .all persons statements made <br />at the public hearing were.considered. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the <br />City of New Brighton that the following Findings of Fact <br />are made in respect to VN-189: <br />1. That the property is zoned R-1, Single Family, <br />which requires a thirty (30) foot front yard <br />setback. <br />2. That the development of this lot has been affected <br />by the construction of an offset cul-de-sac and <br />the construction of a sound barrier. <br />3. That the conditions noted in 2. above have created <br />unique circumstances pertaining to develdpment <br />of the lot. <br />4. That conforming to ordinance requirements creates <br />problems forboth the design and location of a home. <br />5. .That construction of a home meeting setback <br />requirements could impact the privacy and <br />desirability of the subject lot as well as that. <br />of .the adjacent property. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.