My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-196
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2007 10:19:45 PM
Creation date
2/28/2007 2:47:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. Extract of Minutes <br />VN-196, .Carlson <br />Page.. #2 <br />not be in keeping with-the rest of the neighborhood. .Thee <br />property owner to the south was also absent but had requested <br />th8t the .B~,ard be presented with_a letter of opposition that he <br />had previously submitted. The primary objection of the property <br />owner to the south was that the subdivision would not be in <br />character with the .neighborhood.. <br />Mayor 5enden noted that 'lie has-been in contact with theproperty <br />owner to the north and that this neighbor is :presently investigat- <br />ng the development of his land and wants to determine how the <br />subdivision of Carlson's land will affect his property. A lso, <br />if the property owner to the north sold .Carlson the needed <br />acreage in order to create lots of required width,-the house <br />presently located at the site would still impair proper subdivis- <br />ion of the land: Therefore the. property-owner to the north is <br />still in strong opposition. <br />Carlson indicated that he was willing to dedicate part of his <br />property for the-road and that the concern over the road was not <br />warranted. <br />Rick Brickner, a neighbor to the south, on lot 37, has a lot <br />that is only 55 feet in width. He was not opposed to the sub- <br />division-and he stated he has no problem with his lot that has <br />a substandard width. <br />Medved remarked that the subdivision would result in smaller <br />lots than is indicated by the general character of the neighborhood <br />in light of the amount of dry land available on the site. He also <br />commented that he-has not seen any hardship on the applicant as <br />it relates to the nature of the land. <br />Brown stated that the Board of Review had previously recommended <br />to the City Council that the variance-application be..approved, <br />but since that time several issues have been brought to light. <br />The City Council previously took no action on the matter until <br />these concerns were investigated. Brown then read the resolution <br />that had been prepared by staff. (See attachment). <br />Brown moved, Williams seconded to approve and submit the resolution <br />to the-City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.