Laserfiche WebLink
«• ~ Octoter 10, 179 <br />.4y~:V" d `r0 :i^P?I^.•-~,~ ~, „-;,.~;T „F _-,c/„T r-I, <br />LLL J J:~.IV 1 s J~' a V .~'L :., lJ.~ ~ c~ `I L1. L1.~~ J ~J <br />~jP inten~? to C,?`:'P.:'t the ~"OCie!1 ~~i~h ~:^.e ttAO :iP.W lOtS .~0~ 2Vi.'1~ c•.-r <br />ficient frontage on ~ ~subtic street by deCicatirg (or givi :g tF~e cit,;~ <br />the option to ave ~~:'.icatec at ar.;; tire, at your c?~oir.e) a stria of <br />land up to 17 feet wi,~e Tong tre ~~~est side of this property. '^his is <br />in adc.ition to the eigka feet that has been previously set aGice for <br />public road nur~oses and woul$ give a total of 2S feet set asic.e for <br />»ub?ic road ^ur--oses. This would provice land for tre ePStralf of a <br />dub? is road that could. be out in e.t any ti-ae after the otrer half is <br />aauired. If the land is not taken. for public pt2rnoses i:~:,ediatel;~, I <br />propose that the north lot be allo~•~ed access accross this 17 foot stria <br />by a ?private easement until the dedication takes place. <br />These variances are reouested because an e:~cessive amount of land ~s <br />for one single family home is-held under the current plotting. The <br />property is unioue in that it is considerably longer than it is wise. <br />Its current approximate dimentions are a width of 138.07 feet, a length <br />of 387 feet and an area of 53,433 square feet (1.23 acres). This is <br />an excessive amount. of land for one single family home. <br />The new urorosPd plot Ulan urould divide the property into two oarcela <br />which would meet or exceed all other ream *ements other than width. Tre <br />vroaosed plat would divide the land into two rectangular -~arc?ls ~•~hich <br />would be 70.3 feet by 337 feet and 67.77 feet by 387 .feet with areas <br />respectively of 27,206 square feet (.62 acres) and 26,227 aeuare feet <br />(.60 acre). These are 272 per cent and 262 per cent o° t':e minimum <br />a-ea ream-~ement. <br />If split into two lots, this _Jroposed plot wouldbe consistent with the <br />neighborrood. There are many lets in the area :hat are less t_^_an the <br />75 foot minimu.•n with many of they being only 5a to 55 feet in width. <br />The ~~nia•~e circu.-~stance sool,Jing to this property is that t'rere is an <br />excessive amount of very valuable lakesrore land that as one unit is <br />impractical. The shape of the lard being extremely deep *~akes the nox•- <br />na2 width rea uire*.aent a hardship. The ~,ardship created is an extrsae <br />one b?~use one width is so close to meeting the enact letter of the <br />width rea_uirement and with the width rea ui*ement beins missed by only <br />7.2 feet and 4.? feet on the two lots res_:Jectively. The current urban <br />land useage is a wasteful one. <br />