My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-207
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2007 7:25:45 AM
Creation date
3/5/2007 11:53:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DONALD P~ Mc GINN <br />PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER <br />- REGISTERED ARCHITECT <br />2506 BRENNER STREET <br />ST. PAUL, MN, 551 i3 <br />PAGE TWO RE: 2303 14A STREET NORTHWEST <br /> PLOT aPL'AN REVIEW <br />CODE SET BACK PLAN SET BACK <br />FRONT YARD 30 NORTH CORNER OF GARAGE 17. <br /> OUTSIDE CORNER OF GARAGE 3l <br /> NORTH CORNER OF HOUSES 32 <br /> VISUAL AVERAGE OF FRONT YARD 28 <br />STREET YARD 30 EAST CORNER OF GARAGE ~ 0 <br />• EAST CORNER OF HOUSE 20 <br /> NORTH CORNER OF GARAGE 24 <br />' VISUAL AVERAGE OF STREET YARD 7S DETERIvF1NED BY <br /> E7tISTING TREES WHICH WILL BE.PROTECTED TO <br />Zr~~,9A{r} REMAIN.~F.ROM BUILDING 70 PROPE RTY LINE. <br />SIDE TOWARD R1 3O SAME COMMENTS <br />THE ABOVE DATA IS OFFERED TO SAVE SOME THE TIME OF <br />FIGURING !T, AND TO POINT OUT THAT THE FIGURES ARE <br />PRACTICALLY WORTHLESS THIS DESIGN :DOES- NOT HAVE <br />FENCE LIKE WALLS PARALLEL TO THE PROPERTY LINES. THIS <br />DESIGN EFFECTIVELY OPENS THE PERIMcTER AREAS OF THE <br />LOT TO NEIGHBOR AND MOTORIST ALIKE. <br />I AM MAKING THIS. APPEAL NOW, WHCLE: [SHOULD HAVE MADE IT <br />SIX MONTHS AGO WHEN I BEGAN THE DESIGN, BECAUSE [WAS GIVEN <br />INCORRECT INFORMATION WHEN I PHONES NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL <br />FOR SET BACK REQUIREMENTS. BEFORE JULY FIFTH, t WAS SURE <br />THERE WOULD BE NO PROBLEM OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT AND' <br />I PROCEEDED ON MANY FRONTS. I MORTGAGED MY HOUSE AND BOUGHT <br />THE LOT, I PREPARED THE PLANS -AND TOOK BIDS ON EXCAVATION <br />AND FOUNDATION WORK. WE WERE READY TO DIG JULY N"INTR. THIS <br />DELAY. IS VERY COSTE:Y. THE INTEREST ON MY LOAN IS $17.00 A DAY <br />AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION WEATHER IS GROWING SHOF.~T, THIS DELAY <br />COULD KILL. MY HOPE OF BUILDING A HOME.. <br />!F YOU ENFORCE THE SIDE YARD RESTRICTIONS,- ACCORDING TO CODE, <br />ON THIS LOT,.THE TOTAL REQUIRED IS 50 FEET WHICH EQUALS ONE-HALF <br />THE WIDTH OF THE LOT. THIS 1S DUE TO THE FACT THAT THIS LOT [S <br />SANDWICHED I@irTWEEN THE STREET AND AN R-1 LOT. THE TOTAL WOULD <br />BE ONLY t0 FEET IF THIS WERE A TYPICAL DUPLEX LOT. -THE TOTAL <br />REQUIRED WOULD ONLY BE TEN FEET -FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING <br />1N AN R-I DISTRCYCT. I FEEL THIS ENFORCEMENT OF THE CODE WOULD <br />BE EXCESSIVE AND DISCRIMINATORY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.