Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO <br />NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL <br />OF APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, VN-212 <br />WHEREAS, An application for a variance, VN-212 has been <br />made by Berger Transfer and.Storage, Inc..to permit the <br />installation of a 6 foot high fence in a side street yard of <br />an industrial site; and <br />WHEREAS, The procedural history of'the application is <br />as follows: <br />-1. That an application for a variance, VN-212 was filed <br />with the City on October 1, 1979. <br />2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed the <br />application at its regular meeting on November 20, 1979 <br />3. The written comments and analysis of the City Planner <br />and all-person's statements made at the- Board of <br />Review meeting were considered. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Review that <br />the following Findings of Fact are made in respect to VN-212;, <br />1. That the site is located in a I-2,.Heavy Industrial <br />zoning district. <br />2. That the site is unique in that it is enclosed on all <br />sides by public street. <br />3. That a six foot fence is.necessary-for security and <br />a hardship would result if the zoning code was <br />literally enforced only allowing the applicant a fence' <br />of 32 feet in height. <br />3. That the fence is an opaque chain.link fence which <br />will not impair the visibility of persons traveling <br />on adjacent public streets. <br />4. That the proposed fence will be setback on the inside <br />of the berm and landscaping and therefore will not <br />create an appearance that would adversely affect <br />adjacent property owners and would be consistent with <br />similar security -fences in that area. <br />BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the application for VN-212 <br />is hereby recommended for approval subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the fence w i-11 be installed in conformance with <br />the modified site plan signed and dated by the <br />applicant and City Plann-er; <br />2. That the fence will be opaque and will not have slats <br />that would interfere with traffic visibility <br />adversely; and <br />3. That the fence will be well maintained and kept in <br />repair. <br />Adopted this day of 1979. <br />Steven Schmidt, Chairman <br />Joan M. Archer, City Planner