Laserfiche WebLink
<br />` -2- f <br /> <br />4. Therefore any additional development units would require <br />an amendment to PRD-27 to exceed the number of units <br />previously approved - this procedure would be the same E <br />as original PRD-27 - Rezoning considerations, PRb public <br />hearings - Plat public hearings; f <br />5. Since the original PRD took several years for approvals <br />and there.are no real merits to allow additional units `i <br />from what was previously a <br />pproved, staff does not recommend <br />that PRD-27 be amended. This recommendation also reflects <br />the concerns of the Park Board and Director of Parks. <br />Second Alternative - The second alternative from a planning prospective <br />is acceptable. It leaves the pond configuration as is and leaves a <br />fiat area for driveway access to the park as required by the City <br />Council. This alternative will only reduce the amount of fill material <br />to be removed and is supported by myself. <br />