My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-218
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 1:08:25 PM
Creation date
3/6/2007 12:22:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report #80-209 <br />December.. 2,, 1980 <br />APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE <br />VN-218, CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY INC <br />PURPOSE <br />To consider a request for variance for less than the 'required front <br />yard setback and an adjustment to side yard setback approved by. <br />building permit, LP-83. <br />BACKGROUND <br />E <br />APPLICANT: Irvin Moen <br />Chemical Technology Inc. <br />LOCATION: 2172 Old Highway #8 <br />CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY <br />1.'May '22, 1979 LP-83 was approved for.a 35,280.3 square foot <br />building with a 40 foot front yard setback and 65 foot side <br />yard setback to the north of the building. <br />.2..November 21, 1979 The Building Inspector issued building <br />permit #7010 for the building and site work <br />3. July 18, 1980 A temporary certificate of occupancy was <br />issued for the buidling. An Irrevocable Letter Of <br />- Credit (No. 1078) was submitted to the City to assure <br />that the remaining site work be completed. <br />4.. July 1980_A mortgage--survey--was conducted by Comstock <br />& Davis, Inc., which revealed that the original survey under <br />which the building was constructed was incorrect. <br />5. In August 1980 the mortgage company informed City staff <br />of the error and stated that the building encroaches <br />approximately 3 feet into the 40 foot front yard setback. <br />Also, the north side of the building is 62.05 and 61.97 <br />feet from the side property line instead of the approved <br />65 foot setback. <br />CTAFF rnMMPNTC <br />There are only two options for the property owner in regard to the <br />mistake in surveying-which-resulted in the building not.being <br />constructed in the proper location: <br />1.-That the building be moved; or <br />2. That the property owner request a variance to allow <br />the building to remain in its present location.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.