My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-218
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 1:08:25 PM
Creation date
3/6/2007 12:22:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F <br />Report #80=209 <br />s December 2, 1980 <br /> <br /> <br />APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE <br />VN-218, CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY INC. Y <br />z <br />PURPOSE <br />To consider a request for`,variance:for less than the required front <br />yard setback and an adjustment to side yard setback approved by <br />building permit, LP-83. <br />BACKGROUND <br />APPLICANT: Irvin Moen <br />Chemical Technology Inc. <br />r <br />LOCATION: 2172 Old Highway #8 '. <br />-CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY' <br />1 .' May"22, -1979 LP-83 was approved for.a 35,280.3 square foot <br />buil-ding with a 40 foot front yard setback and 65-foot-side <br />yard setback to the north of the building. <br />2. November 21, 1979 The Building Inspector issued building <br />permit #7010 for the building and site work. <br />of occupancy was <br />3. July 18, 1980 A temporary certificate <br />, <br />issued for the buidding. An Irrevoc'able,Letter Of <br />Credit (No. 1078) was submitted to the City to assure <br />that the remaining site work be completed. <br />4. July -1-980 A mortgage .survey._was . conducted _by_. Comstock <br />& Davis, Inc., which revealed that the original survey under <br />Which the building was constructed was incorrect. <br />5. In August 1980-the--mortgage company-informed--City staff <br />of the error and stated that the building encroaches <br />approximately 3 feet into the.40 foot front yard setback. <br />Also;.the north side of the building is 62.05 and 61.97 <br />feet from the side property line instead of the approved <br />65 foot setback. <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />There are only two options for the property 'owner in regard to the <br />mistake in surveying which resulted in the building not being <br />constructed in the proper location: <br />l .. That the.bui 1 di ng be moved; or <br />2. That the property owner request a variance to allow <br />- - the building to remain in its present location. <br /> E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.